I’m usually pretty up to date with current events although what appears here on the blog could be any old random thing that pops into my head. For some reason, I had not heard of Crystal Cox but thanks to Twitter I happened upon this post by Blogpreneur which explained that Ms. Cox, blogger extraordinaire, 1 had been sued for 2.5 million dollars for writing defamatory blog posts about a finance company.

Her argument was that she fancies herself an “investigative journalist” and should therefore have been protected by “media shield law protection” which generally protects journalists from having to disclose sources. Even without looking at Oregon’s Shield Law 2 or having any idea what that meant, I retweeted and replied to Blogpreneur’s author, Mac,

“Seems obvious. Bloggers are not journalists.”

He replied: “Christina, true but some bloggers think of themselves Jornos, and act accordingly.”

Really? Some of you actually believe yourselves to be journalists just because you have a blog? Please tell me it ain’t so. If having a blog makes me a journalist than a scissor shall make me…a seamstress. or something…wait how about having a car shall make me a NASCAR driver. (Better, huh?)

Okay, maybe it isn’t that simple. Here is what I know:

Some states do actually have a broad enough shield law that may cover you as a blogger. For instance, Washington’s Shield Law, according to Reuters, includes any “entity that is in the business of news gathering and disseminating news or information to the public by any means”. You could possibly refuse to disclose your sources as a blogger, in Washington.

In Minnesota, it also seems a bit broad and may cover bloggers as well. Minnesota Statute 595.025 covers the forms of defamation and disclosure requirements.

Defamation, in case you weren’t sure, is a false statement that causes a person harm. If you are going to state something in print, on a blog about a person or business, I’d suggest being prepared to disclose sources or proof that what you are saying is accurate. Even journalists can be sued for defamation.

Example:  I can say you are ugly (opinion). I cannot say you had plastic surgery (lie) and if your organic skin care business loses money because of my lie, we have defamation.

If defamation of character sounds familiar to you, it may be because slander and libel are threats that are tossed around quite a bit between feuding family members, neighbors and once upon a time friends. “I’ll sue you for defamation of character” or “You’ll catch a slander lawsuit”. Neither of these are cases that are usually taken seriously because 1) they are difficult to prove and 2) you can’t usually sue your neighbor for 2.5 million dollars so it isn’t worth it.

Proving Defamation, Slander or Libel

Slander is a result of “spoken” defamation; libel is a result of “print” defamation. Slander is difficult to prove because it’s all word of mouth and based on he said/she said accounts. Libel however is easier to prove…especially if it’s printed on a blog for all to read. The company then only has to prove that the act was harmful and loss of revenue is usually sufficient enough of a loss.

It is because of these points that bloggers need to watch what they’re saying (and writing) about people and companies. 3

In short, Crystal Cox made statements regarding the finance company and then did not disclose sources or proof of her statements, which resulted in being sued for defamation. 2.5 million dollars worth of defamation. According to ABC News, Crystal Cox stated “that she can’t pay the fine and gleefully said the defamation case succeeded in giving her accusation more publicity.”

I don’t know about you, but publicity is hardly worth it to me. Besides, I like to know that as a business myself, I am protected against people printing any sort of frivolous information they wish to print.

What do you think? Do bloggers deserve the same protection as journalists? And is this lawsuit a good or bad thing for bloggers?

Note:  I’m not an attorney. I don’t even play one anywhere. If you are currently being sued, you’re an idiot for consulting my blog for help.

  1. I should blog about more important stuff than Walmart.
  2. Oregon’s Shield Law is pretty clear about who it covers.
  3. Doesn’t apply to product reviewers because you guys only say good things anyway.
email

Related posts:

  • http://ciaraballintyne-fantasy.blogspot.com Ciara Ballintyne

    Fascinating. There is no protection for journalists against defamation in Australia. The only real defence is that what you said was the truth. There may be a few other bits and pieces that help your case, but it’s very limited. Of course, in ustralia, a company also can’t sue for defamation – only real people. So you can say whatever you like about your bank ;-)

    Unless and until they change the law again, of course. And companies may have recourse under other protections in Australia, such as injurious damage to business reputation.

    I would think the safer bet (rather than arguing about whethger you are or are not a journalist) is simply, don’t defame anyone! On the internet, jurisdictional boundaries can be hard to find and you may not be protected in other countries.
    Ciara Ballintyne recently posted..Six Sentence Sunday: Slang #2

    • Solitary Mama

      Great point, Ciara. Definitely safer and in our best interests as bloggers to watch what we write.

  • http://www.BeardandPigtails.com Beard

    Did that Wal*Mart band ever end up suing you? They could use some cash for new band vests.
    Beard recently posted..Song #49

    • Solitary Mama

      They can’t sue me. I told the truth. That band was whack.

  • http://www.unfitparenting.com Erica

    I have to say I am slightly offended that you don’t consider me a journalist. I’ve been journaling since my son was 18 months old. He’s 7 now. So that’s like, a LOT of journaling experience right there.

    Can I sue you for saying I’m not a journalist? Because there’s this canoe I’ve been wanting that not only vibrates and rotates but also THRUSTS. I can just lie there and play snippets of Sean Connery’s voice from my laptop. Badda bing, badda boom. I forget where I was going with this…
    Erica recently posted..No words needed

    • Solitary Mama

      Guess I’m going to have to sue you, get a restraining order and also call the police. Oh and block you too.

      • http://www.unfitparenting.com Erica

        On a side note – can you really block someone from your blog? Because I have a special stalker…
        Erica recently posted..No words needed

        • Solitary Mama

          I dont think so. I did edit your comment. Bet you can’t guess where.

          • http://www.unfitparenting.com Erica

            Ha! Canoe!
            Erica recently posted..No words needed

            • http://bubblegumonmyshoe.com Cari

              Erica, I know you are on blogger, you can block someone if they are following you on Google Friend Connect. Quite the canoe girl!
              Cari recently posted..Blogs or Posts I Won’t Read and Why

              • http://chasingserenity09.blogspot.com Angel

                That was an awesome edit! I had to read it twice. Oh and Erica if there happen to be two of those “canoes” I will gladly take one. ;) Except mine would have some tidbits of Gerard Butler telling me I’m hot……oh yeah.

                I am NOT by any means a journalist, I don’t get paid, I don’t have a clue on what current events are happening, all I know is I have no money and somebody somewhere is at fault, lmao. But I agree with you, we aren’t journalists, if you want to be considered a journalist then go to school and get a job as one, I think it is actually maybe a little insulting to journalists, who did go to school and busted there behinds (some of them anyway) to do a job they are truly passionate about, for a blogger to just up and decide she is one. That’s just my opinion though, for whatever it’s worth.
                Angel recently posted..Break out the spanx

  • http://www.thebutterbottomblog.com Richard Monroe

    As today’s journalisms standards are so shoddy, I consider almost everything I read online as some form of crappy journalism or crappy blogging. CNN.com has this stupid iReporters where random people ‘report’ on some news item. At this point, the lines are so grey, I would gladly take a well written blogger over a poorly written journalist. On one plus to journalist, usually a poorly written on-line journalist is still worlds better to read than a poorly written blog. Those are just so painful.
    But to the basic question, just because you blog, that doesn’t make you a journalist.
    Richard Monroe recently posted..How Did You Name Your Kid?

    • Solitary Mama

      Today I’m a policeman.

  • http://bubblegumonmyshoe.com Cari, Barely a Blogger, hardly a journalist

    I think we have a responsibility as readers too. I’m sure in your legal eagle world you see a lot of frivolous law-suits. Lord help us all if that took off in blogland! People would be smacking down lawsuits right and left over comments and posts because someone said something they didn’t like or agree with. Bloggers should not be protected by journalistic laws, because they aren’t journalists. I consider blogs a source of opinion; I don’t go to a blog to learn how to apply a tourniquet properly. I would need to go to a more reputable source. If you’re going to lose a limb, you want to do that right. Be informed and don’t believe everything you read, that simple. I also believe there to be outrageous media bias out there, but how can it not exist, we are only human. A blogger has no responsibility to publish differing opinions/comments either, therefore influencing or manipulating their feedback to only support their viewpoint. Sketchy if you ask me. I’d say bloggers would like the protection, but would be unwilling to uphold journalistic standards. And then nothing would be funny anymore either and I might have to quit blogging. Good post!
    Cari, Barely a Blogger, hardly a journalist recently posted..Blogs or Posts I Won’t Read and Why

  • http://oh.so-very.me Jenny

    I do NOT consider myself a journalist. I don’t report news. And I don’t want to be a mafia hit target :P I am plain and simple Jane Doe Blogging Wonder!!
    Jenny recently posted..Surviving the Holidays ~ A discussion

  • http://stuckathomemom.com/ Stuck At Home Mom

    What makes someone a journalist?
    I never put much thought into it, of course I shoot my blog off about everything that pisses me off. I should look up Maine’s whatever you call it law, see if I’m protected.
    Stuck At Home Mom recently posted..How My Blog Paid for Christmas

  • http://chopperpapa.com Chopperpapa

    I can think of myself as president – doesn’t mean that I am president. No bloggers aren’t journalists, nor are they product spokesmen, or consumer reporters.

    Bloggers are individuals with opinions Goodbye.
    Chopperpapa recently posted..8 steps to consider before correcting your ex-husband’s parenting blunders

  • http://storiesandsweetpotatoes.com StoriesAndSweetPotatoes

    Great topic and post. Some bloggers probably cover certain stories better and more balanced than most “real journalists”. Nowadays many people who are “real journalists” don’t even have the education or training to back it up. I’m not a journalist and I don’t pretend to be one on my blog, but this is very relevant topic for today’s media crazed world.
    StoriesAndSweetPotatoes recently posted..My Favorite Books Of 2011

  • http://www.amberrisme.com Amberr Meadows

    I’ll just watch what I blog about, or change names of the person I’m referring to. Surely I can’t get sued for slandering “Apple” or “Ghoul”…right? :-)

  • http://dontcallmemarge.blogspot.com Marjorie McAtee

    This is why I don’t use names.

  • http://www.singleguywithkids.com Steve

    I found that interesting. I never ever would have considered myself a journalist… I do consider myself a writer and humorist.

    Does that mean I may have to reveal the sources of my jokes? Ha!

    Great post!
    Steve recently posted..The Princess’s Ball